IBM · NYSE · Technology · $243.7B· Short % 2.3%
$257.81-0.2%vs prev closeclose of 2026-10-30 · not real-time
International Business Machines Corporation, together with its subsidiaries, provides integrated solutions and services in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and the Asia Pacific. It operates through Software, Consulting, Infrastructure, and Financing segments.· Source: company profile (yfinance/Yahoo Finance)
💰 Net stock buybacks last fiscal year: $1.4B · 0.56% of market cap
vs. analyst consensus target. The target is an opinion, not a prediction or buy signal.
A summary of valuation factors — not a buy recommendation. You decide.
| Company | PER | PBR | ROE | Div | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| International Business Machines Corporation | 22.0 | 6.9 | 35% | 2.6% | 40 |
| Dell Technologies Inc. | 24.7 | – | – | 0.5% | 49 |
| SAP SE | 29.3 | 73.7 | 18% | 1.3% | 46 |
| Arista Networks Inc. | 53.3 | 14.4 | 31% | 0.0% | 39 |
| Amphenol Corporation | 34.5 | 11.4 | 40% | 0.7% | 53 |
| Salesforce Inc. | 21.0 | 4.9 | 19% | 0.8% | 37 |
Same sector, nearest by market cap · – = no data (value traps excluded)
Government-backed
IBM is the largest recipient of the May 2026 CHIPS Act quantum package — slated for $1B (matched by IBM's own $1B) to build a US quantum foundry via a new entity (Anderon), in exchange for a minority, non-controlling federal equity stake. The package signed letters of intent with 9 companies totaling ~$2.01B. · $1.0B
The chart (long-term trend, Ichimoku cloud) is for observation only — not a buy or sell signal.
Shows only where the current price sits within the channel structure (based on past swings).
The channel, levels and gaps are observational geometry showing where the current price sits within past swing structure. They are not a rebound/bottom probability, a price target, or a buy/sell signal — plain chart patterns carry no reliable predictive edge (our backtest conclusion).
A highlight of the key metrics detailed below.
Undervalued vs sector 45/100 within Technology — higher means lower multiples (PER·PB·EV/EBITDA·PSR) than sector peers. Growth sectors carry higher multiples, so this is a same-sector relative view, not absolute cheapness (observational).
PER vs its own history PER is in the top 30% of its own 8-year range (historically expensive)Range 7.7–28.9 · median 15.4Observational only — a lower PER can reflect slowing growth, so 'cheap' isn't always undervalued.
Top-tier in 0 of 7 evaluated strategies
Ranks within the US market — tap to open that ranking (ranks are per market).
Past returns — they do not guarantee future results.
EV as reported by our data provider (Yahoo Finance) · net debt is our own calc (total debt − cash) · definitions differ, so EV need not equal market cap + net debt (minority interest, preferred stock)
Color: green = healthy, red = caution (absolute thresholds, value/quality metrics only). Downside vol & Sortino are annualized. Max drawdown = largest drop from a 3-year peak; volatility = 1-year annualized. Price/Graham < 1 = below Graham fair value (profitable, positive-equity names only). RSI < 30 = oversold. For reference only.
A Japanese trend tool. Price above the 'cloud' is supportive; below is weak. A strong uptrend doesn't mean it's cheap — stocks that have run up are usually more expensive.