SK hynix Inc.
000660 · KOSPI · Technology · ₩999.9T (approx. $749.9B)· Nat'l Pension stake 7.55% (2024-12-31)
₩1,418,000-7.1%vs prev closeclose of 2026-10-30 · not real-time
Valuation summary
Looks fairly valued
SK hynix Inc. research, develops manufactures, and sells semiconductor devices in Korea, China, rest of Asia, the United States, and Europe.· Source: company profile (yfinance/Yahoo Finance)
Valuation summary59/100Downside rigidity40/100Upside potential73/100
vs. fair value39 analysts
+123%Undervalued
Price ₩1,418,000Fair value ₩3,157,409
vs. analyst consensus target. The target is an opinion, not a prediction or buy signal.
Score summary
A summary of valuation factors — not a buy recommendation. You decide.
Data as of: 2026-10-30 · end-of-day, not real-timeData as of — price/valuation/technicals: the close date above · NPS stake: US=quarterly SEC 13F, Korea=annual · short interest: exchange's latest settlement · fundamentals: latest filing🔬 CHIPS
Peers
| Company | PER | PBR | ROE | Div | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SK하이닉스 | 6.2 | 3.8 | 93% | 0.2% | 59 |
| 삼성전자 | 9.9 | 2.6 | 31% | 0.6% | 64 |
| SK스퀘어 | 3.5 | 2.1 | 85% | 0.2% | 72 |
| 삼성전기 | 89.8 | 8.6 | 11% | 0.2% | 35 |
| LG전자 | 25.6 | 1.0 | 5% | 0.9% | 57 |
| 한미반도체 | 77.8 | 23.0 | 33% | 0.4% | 42 |
Same sector, nearest by market cap · – = no data (value traps excluded)
Government-backed
SK hynix (Korea Exchange 000660) received up to $458M in finalized CHIPS Act direct funding for an advanced-packaging (HBM for AI) and R&D facility in West Lafayette, Indiana. · $458M
Chart patterns matched (observational)
Technical patterns for reference — not a buy recommendation.
Price chart
View on Naver Finance →· Chart: Naver Finance
The chart (long-term trend, Ichimoku cloud) is for observation only — not a buy or sell signal.
Structure analysis · observation only
Shows only where the current price sits within the channel structure (based on past swings).
Position: -0.5~0.0 zone · Uptrend channelStructure as of 2026-10-30
Channel levels (price by multiple)
- ×3₩6,992,161
- ×2.5₩6,075,800
- ×2₩5,159,439
- ×1.5₩4,243,079
- ×1₩3,326,718
- ×0.5₩2,410,357
- Baseline (0)₩1,493,996
- Current price₩1,418,000
Unfilled gaps
- Gap downabove price₩1,449,000–₩1,479,000 · Gap width 2.1% · 2026-10-30
- Gap upbelow price₩1,315,000–₩1,336,000 · Gap width 1.6% · 2026-10-27
- Gap downabove price₩1,554,000–₩1,605,000 · Gap width 3.3% · 2026-10-13
- Gap downabove price₩1,653,000–₩1,681,000 · Gap width 1.7% · 2026-10-12
- Gap downabove price₩1,918,584–₩2,069,551 · Gap width 7.9% · 2026-07-16
- Gap downabove price₩2,447,469–₩2,501,458 · Gap width 2.2% · 2026-07-02
- Gap upbelow price₩1,042,600–₩1,077,586 · Gap width 3.4% · 2026-04-14
- Gap upbelow price₩932,642–₩991,619 · Gap width 6.3% · 2026-04-08
- Gap upbelow price₩603,654–₩623,609 · Gap width 3.3% · 2025-12-29
- Gap upbelow price₩578,709–₩579,707 · Gap width 0.17% · 2025-12-23
The channel, levels and gaps are observational geometry showing where the current price sits within past swing structure. They are not a rebound/bottom probability, a price target, or a buy/sell signal — plain chart patterns carry no reliable predictive edge (our backtest conclusion).
A highlight of the key metrics detailed below.
Undervalued vs sector 53/100 within Technology — higher means lower multiples (PER·PB·EV/EBITDA·PSR) than sector peers. Growth sectors carry higher multiples, so this is a same-sector relative view, not absolute cheapness (observational).
PER vs its own history PER is in the bottom 41% of its own 6.8-year range (historically cheap)Range 2.8–52 · median 11.2Observational only — a lower PER can reflect slowing growth, so 'cheap' isn't always undervalued.
Why it looks cheap
- P/E (Price/Earnings)6.2
- Forward P/E3.9
- PEG0.1
Why it might be risky
- –
Strategy ranks
Top-tier in 3 of 7 evaluated strategies
Ranks within the Korea market — tap to open that ranking (ranks are per market).
Valuation
- P/E (Price/Earnings)
- 6.2
- Forward P/E
- 3.9
- P/B (Price/Book)
- 3.8
- PEG
- 0.1
- P/S (Price/Sales)
- 5.3
- Dividend Yield
- 0.2%
- FCF Yield
- 5.6%
- EV/EBITDA
- 7.1
- EV/Sales
- 5.4
- Net Debt / EBITDA
- -0.47
- P/CF (Price/Cash Flow)
- 7.9
Quality & growth
- ROE (Return on Equity)
- 92.7%
- ROA (Return on Assets)
- 33.7%
- Rule of 40
- –
- Earnings Growth
- 59.3%
Past returns
1M
-20.2%
3M
+1.2%
6M
+16.1%
1Y
+196.9%
3Y
+1084.2%
5Y
+1345.2%
Past returns — they do not guarantee future results.
Enterprise value
Market cap
₩999.9T
Enterprise value (EV)
₩1018.5T
Net cash
₩66.9T
vs market cap
101.9%
EV as reported by our data provider (Yahoo Finance) · net debt is our own calc (total debt − cash) · definitions differ, so EV need not equal market cap + net debt (minority interest, preferred stock)
More indicators
Sortino
2.52
Downside vol
59.27%
Max drawdown (3y)
-58.09%
Deep historical drawdown
Volatility (annual.)
92.18%
Large price swings
RSI(14) daily
45.50
RSI(14) weekly
44.80
RSI(14) monthly
57.60
vs 200d MA
-4.98%
Below 200-day avg
Trend slope (annualized)
167.18%
Recent uptrend
FCF margin
29.48%
Beta
2.39
Moves more than market
Payout ratio
1.32%
Sustainable
Price/Graham
1.02
Around fair value
Golden cross
○ aligned
Color: green = healthy, red = caution (absolute thresholds, value/quality metrics only). Downside vol & Sortino are annualized. Max drawdown = largest drop from a 3-year peak; volatility = 1-year annualized. Price/Graham < 1 = below Graham fair value (profitable, positive-equity names only). RSI < 30 = oversold. For reference only.
Long-term trend (Ichimoku)
A Japanese trend tool. Price above the 'cloud' is supportive; below is weak. A strong uptrend doesn't mean it's cheap — stocks that have run up are usually more expensive.
D
Below the cloud (weak)
W
Above the cloud (supportive)
M
Above the cloud (supportive)